I have heard some say that we need to protect America’s institutions, and that the FBI and DOJ are off limits because there would be severe damage to our republic if the reputation of these agencies is tainted. Let me respond to this, by highlighting the fact that there is no reputation to preserve, if these agencies have been weaponized in the name of politics. The Constitution was written and implemented, as an attempt to prevent this type of thing from happening, and handing out harsh punishment to any that perpetrated this level of blatant sedition and abuse of power. These institutions need to be held accountable, and the damage that is done when these agencies go rogue, unbeknownst to the American people, is far greater than the damage that is done to the country if they are allowed to operate politically, while using the full force and authority of the Federal Government to push an agenda. These agencies have lost a great deal of credibility, and the media blackout of this corruption is shameful. The media’s obsession with Russian unicorns, and 24/7 reporting on Trump/Russia collusion with 0 evidence, while the largest scandal in our nation’s history is taking place before our eyes, is nothing short of disgraceful. This is not a partisan issue, but it is being branded as such by the media, and leftist scum that have completed infiltrated and brainwashed the democrat party. If those that are part of the FBI, DOJ, or any other government agency that has been used to attack the American people and their rights, are not held accountable for their criminal behavior, then those agencies need to go the way of the dodo. If the arrests don’t start happening, let’s start shuttering the doors of these alphabet soup agencies.
It drives me insane when a liberal invokes the “trickle-down economics” argument as they attempt to delegitimize tax cuts and/or sweeping reform. Let’s first get something straight, taxpayer money that we as Americans get to keep in our own pocket is a positive thing. Someone that thinks that the government spends money more responsibly than the consumer, has not been paying attention. Even if government was more responsible in their spending, they are still taking our money. The government wastes money, dollar after dollar, without any inhibitions and most of the time, without rhyme or reason. They do this because it is not their money, and they do nothing for it. There are a more than a handful of alphabet soup agencies that we could do without, and that do no service to the American people. The Bureau of Land Management for example has been turned into a militant law enforcement agency that continues to go around the country, seizing land in the name of the federal government. They are always looking for an area that they can turn into the next national park, and they have terrorized ranchers out west at gunpoint, while murdering their cattle. In the states of Oregon, Utah, and Nevada, a majority of the land, that is more than 50% of these state have been claimed by the federal government. Uncle Sam owns 52% of the land in western states, giving the impression that we are witnessing a warming to a communist position regarding land ownership, and a gradual shift toward the abolition of private property rights. Back to taxes, so that I do not get too far off subject. Why don’t we shut down toxic agencies like the BLM that rob Americans of our rights, rather than protect them? Why ask for a revenue neutral tax cut when there is waste and abuse that we are throwing money at? After all, revenue neutral only infers that there really is no tax cut, there is only a redistribution of the tax burden. Tax cuts must be done in conjunction with major cuts in spending, or it’s not really a cut, but rather smoke and mirrors meant to deceive lay man taxpayers. Liberals will try to point to the state of Kansas and the economic woes that they have suffered after a massive tax cut signed by their Governor. With data supplied by the CBO one that is not wearing the partisan goggles can see that most of the shortfall was a result of a shift in capital gains that occurred due to the expiration of the Bush tax cuts. Liberal arguments are often crafted as bullet points so that when they hear an opposing viewpoint they can start down the list. Even when a liberal doesn’t follow talking points, and poses reasonable questions, they don’t usually have data or historical context to back up most of the insinuations that they are trying to convey. The most recent example that can be used to debunk the myth that tax cuts explode the deficit, can be found in President Bush’s tax cuts, starting in 2001 and with the last of the cuts being implemented in 2003. The tax cuts for the rich argument falls apart when you consider that the top 1% of earners paid 23% more in 2007 with the tax cuts still in effect, than they did in 2000 before the cuts that were done under Bush. To compare, the bottom half of earners (50%) paid 6 billion dollars less in 2007 that they did prior to cuts in 2000. Moving on to the deficit, that the liberals say went through the roof. The deficit actually was at 160 billion in 2007, less than 15% of what it was in 2012 under the Obama administration. From the year 2003, when the last of the tax cuts were implemented to the year 2007, federal income tax revenues went from $793.7 billion, to $1.16 trillion. This is a 47% increase in revenue, but the liberal argument just omits these facts when attempting to make their case. Bush’s cuts cut the capital gains tax by 25% but the revenues rose to 18.5% of the GDP by the year 2007. The explanation for these economic changes is quite simple, economics 101 type of stuff, all on the macro level. There are no nuances to examine or small details to analyze. More money in the pockets of consumers and the businesses they frequent leads to higher revenues. This happens when businesses are allowed more flexibility to hire due to the decreased tax burden, which leads to more workers, and these additional workers that are participating in the economy act as additional taxpayers. More taxpayers results in more revenue. Wealthy individuals are the ones that sign middle class workers’ paycheck. Those with a lot of money that participate in commerce, need workers to do the work and they pay a portion of their wealth to the workers so that they can continue to make money. As the business and customer base expands, more workers are hired. Middle class workers can’t have more in their pocket if they don’t have a prosperous business owner to work for, unless they start their own business, and hire their own people, making themselves the wealthy one. So I ask the liberals, how is anything but trickle down possible? Middle class voters are an important group to have on your side come Election Day. Politicians are all about getting reelected, which is why we continue to see the class warfare, ala Karl Marx, that puts the poor and middle class, against the wealthy corporations and small business owners. This is the politicized hell that we live in.
The CIA still stands by its original claim, that Russia interfered in the 2016 election. According to US intelligence agencies, Russia did this via propaganda that targeted American voters. One must note that these claims are not attempting to give the impression that anything was "hacked", contrary to the fake news regurgitated by the likes of MSNBC, CNN, and other left-wing propaganda factories. The CIA says that they have "proof" of this interference, but let's attempt to put a couple of things in perspective here. First of all we live in the age of the internet, where we have encyclopedia after encyclopedia, any library in the world, and all other forms of reference at our fingertips. Propaganda can be created and distributed on the net by anyone, Al Qaeda, ISIS, Russia, even our own American news media. But this accessibility to a vast collection of information is only a small part of the equation here. The thing that we must remember, is that we as Americans, and human beings in general, have a capacity for high levels of intelligence and the ability to reason and come to our own conclusions, when presented with a situation or fact pattern. Modern day American politics, takes away this ability to reason and employs a partisan slant for most, and injects partisan ideology into rational though. It has become more about cheering for the home team, (donkeys or elephants) and ignoring principles, morality, and virtue. Bottom line here is, the Constitution is not a football game, but it does have a set of rules. Football and other spectator sports are not consequential at the end of the day, whereas politics and the operation of our Government, affects your life drastically, whether you have an interest in it or not. In other words, those that say, "I don't follow that political stuff", are followed by the "that political stuff" even though they are ignorant on the subject. Alright back to propaganda and its effect on the human mind. Information that is distributed, true or false, must go through our filter of human intelligence. We still have the ability to reason and make decisions. The propaganda that exists is still subject to reason and intelligence. What intelligence agencies do not tell us, is that decisions are made every day based on consumption of information that may or may not be accurate. Infomercials, commercials for popular products (Anheuser Busch, Geico, Progressive, etc) and other methods of persuasion are useful when trying to attract customers. There is also politically charged journalism that has turned into more of a form of bounty hunting than what would be considered objective journalism. The point here is that information does not force one to act in a particular manner, it can only act as a suggestion. Whether the misinformation comes from Russia, or from CNN, human intelligence is still king. We are not robots, and you need to lay blame where it is due. The blame here goes to our left leaning educational institutions for disabling peoples' ability, and will to reason. The propaganda in this country is far worse than anything coming out of Russia.
Control theory is a school of thought that has been used in the field of criminology for the better part of a century. This theory is based on the idea that conformity cannot be taken for granted, thus crime and delinquency that occurs within an area or community, should be expected if social controls are not implemented. A few important points are to be made here, especially when we are speaking of American society. America was founded on individual responsibility, and we have God given rights that are recognized in our Constitution, as we have always looked to limit the power of the government when it comes to giving Americans the freedom to live their lives. On the opposite side of this coin, you do have the need for the rule of law, and there must be order. The founding fathers tried to create a government that operated in the realm of what they eventually referred to as people’s law. This falls right in the center between a totalitarian state and total anarchy. It was an attempt to create a balance that encourages a sense of liberty but does not allow a free for all. There is a case to be made regarding social controls in the form of criminal law. Even today we are attempting to find that sweet spot when dealing with the power of the police state to deliver justice in the right circumstances.
But, how far is too far and what behavior is to be deemed criminal in nature? After all, criminal acts are not necessarily immoral from a universal perspective. It is also true that just because an act is not illegal, it does not mean that it is not immoral at its core. Conformity is another part of control theory that has profound meaning. Communist regimes require and depend on conformity from the citizenry, and they promote this conformity under threat of physical violence or death toward an individual or their family members. As we look to control the behavior of individuals through control, we must remember that legality is relative and arbitrarily labeling certain behavior as criminal chips away at liberty. I believe that this theory does have a legitimate argument, as the existence of criminal activity over a period without proper enforcement can lead to increased confidence in the criminal ego and encourage more criminal acts due to the perception that there is more opportunity to commit such crimes. Lawmakers must use caution regarding the creation of laws that are meant to promote social order. Knee jerk responses to events must be avoided at all costs and media reports should play no role in policy decisions. Order must be kept but we must remember where we came from and the principles on which this country was founded. Government control should be exercised only within constitutional parameters, as our founders knew the nature of government and what it is capable of if it is given too much unchecked power. George Washington had a great quote referring to the inherent intent of government, “Government is not reason, it is not eloquence — it is force. Like fire it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master; never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action”.
ISIS is being driven from their last stronghold in Raqqa. US and Kurdish forces are making sure that ISIS does not continue the conquest of the middle east that expanded under President Obama and his willful incompetence. The tactical victories that we have scored in the last year, are bittersweet because we realize that ISIS will now bring the fight to us like never before. We have to look at the reality, and recognize that by taking a huge chunk of the jihadi element out of certain middle eastern countries, we are giving terrorists no choice but to disperse and become more operational in their activity. It was always argued that the middle east, and the countries there that provided a safe haven for terrorists, allowed groups like Al Qaeda and ISIS to train fighters and to plan attacks on western countries with little or no interference from western law enforcement or counterterrorism efforts. This is the argument put forth by the neocons as to why we must continue to promote perpetual war in the region.
How many pro war politicians or talking heads have considered what the jihadist reaction would be if we hit them really hard in their own backyard? How many have thought about the possibility of a scenario where the front line changes dramatically in the event of total defeat of ISIS? How vulnerable would EU countries be, and how many weaknesses do we still have here at home in the US? When all is said and done, we have to remember one very important thing. We are not at war with a country, and the boundaries that existed in the past when engaging in conventional warfare, do not exist anymore. We are at war with a conquest ideology, that is written and expressed in detail via Quranic scripture. Anyone the associates Islam with peace, or tolerance, has never sat down with the Quran and studied the pages within that are overflowing with hate and murder. The theme of Islam from the beginning has been killing, hate, and submission, or the antithesis of biblical teachings of peace, love, and free will. The Quran teaches that Muhammad is the figure that they must emulate, because Muhammad is the proposed role model for humanity to follow. Muhammad was a rapist and a murderer. He had a 9 year old bride and had relations with her which constitutes rape in most circles. He preached forcing non-believers to convert, pay a tax, or be killed. He threatened government officials with removal of their possessions and death by his horsemen if they did not recognize and accept Allah and Islam. What kind of role model is this? This is the equivalent of making Ted Bundy a role model for young boys on how to treat women. Until our leaders acknowledge what we are up against, we will continue to be the victims of feckless legislation, and incompetent policy that makes us a country of sitting ducks. Islam is the most clever attempt at deception, that Satan has ever dreamed up. He is able to use it to promote Satanic acts and rituals, while otherwise intelligent people write it off as being “just like Christianity”. This deception continues and the media parrots this narrative while one person after another kills innocent people while screaming Alluah Akbar. These so called extremists, do not pervert Islam’s message, they are interpreting Muhammad’s teachings just as they were meant to be. We need to kick this PC culture to the curb right quick, we are running out of time. Let’s call a spade a spade here. We are at war with Islam, GW Bush and Obama both had it wrong, and they didn’t have the testicular fortitude to come out and say it.
I am making a prediction, with the current state that Europe is in, that it will be the replacement for ISIS's caliphate as the US military and the Kurdish forces that we are supporting, continue to push ISIS out of middle eastern countries where they once held large pieces of land that they had claimed for the caliphate. The EU countries specifically, will fall to their Islamic invaders as they have been allowing them to gain control of institutions, government seats, and pandering to Islamic groups that are constantly screaming discrimination. When the individuals that infiltrated the refugee population from Syria and other war torn countries, decide that they want to activate the millions of jihadists that currently reside in EU countries. Countries like Germany, Italy, France, and the rest of these politically correct countries that bow down to Islam at every turn, are not going to know what hit them, as the invasion has already happened and it is already successful. The jihadists can take the country at will. The fact that citizens of EU countries are not allowed to carry firearms, only makes it easier for the jihadists to seize control, kill, and rape at will. We are not necessarily immune to ISIS fighters migrating here in the US, if they are not already here. Keep in mind we had wide open borders for 8 years under the Muslim apologist BHO, as he tried to sell this suicidal death cult as a "religion of peace". We could very well have millions residing here just as easily, and this is not only likely but quite probable as online jihadist propaganda continues to infect the minds of all ages, races, and walks of life, leading to horrific acts of violence that intend to strike fear in the hearts of all Americans, and these seeds of fear are planted not only by the terrorists themselves, but is also perpetuated by the American media. Europe will be the safe haven that the jihadists travel to when they are banished from the middle east, and they are being driven out and killed in droves at the moment. Europe with its no go zones and the capitulation to Islam and its promotion of violence and sexual slavery, is already in the hands of the Islamic State, and I feel that it may have surpassed the point of no return. Americans are unprepared for the jihadist migration that is upon us, as we continue to hand over our rights and liberties for the promotion of the narrative that it makes us "safer". I do not think the west is ready for ISIS to disperse and show up in our backyard. The citizenry must remain vigilant and not buy into the sheep's mentality. Europe may be lost, but we still have some time here in America to recover before it is too late.
I have an problem with the fact that public schools refrain from teaching the Constitution, while at the same time public education continues to turn out social justice warriors that claim to stand up for their "rights" when they aren't even privy to those stated rights in the first place. My question is, how can you encourage young ones to go out and stand up for their liberties, when they don't understand the word liberty in the first place, nor can they identify with Constitutional rights and the context in which they were established? This breeds uneducated zombies, or "useful idiots" as Vladimir Lenin used to call them. This term is obviously not a term of endearment, but it is not meant to be an insult. Useful idiot, is defined as a person that fights for a cause that he/she does not fully understand. College kids that think communism is superior to capitalism do not have a grasp on what communism is in theory or practice. They are not aware that 95 million + people were murdered at the hands of communist leaders in the 20th century. Instead they are taught to look up to these murderers as role models, or great men. Horrible acts of genocide, by the likes of Mao, Che, and Stalin, is not recognized as evil by academia, and if you compare the number of people killed at the hands of Adolf Hitler, the number murdered by Stalin, Stalin takes the cake. Why the selective condemnation and outrage? Our young people are being brainwashed by educators residing in academia, some of which, acted as domestic terrorists in the 1960's, Bill Ayres and Bernadine Dohrn to name a few. I have to believe that kids aren't taught constitutional rights, because the powers that be want to be able to tell them anything and have them follow blindly, any cause that seem politically expedient for progressivism at any given time. The absence of a foundation, assures that no questions will be asked when the recruiting for foot soldiers begins to perpetuate the spread of toxic leftist ideology at the most opportune time, based on current societal trends. If we are going to have young people stand for liberty, then we must teach them what liberty is, and why it is important.
Terrorism is chaos, but more often than not it is controlled chaos. It is chaotic because it exists in so many forms, but individual attacks seem controlled and organized. Defining terror is not as easy as it may seem. There is not a one size fits all formula to aid in classification of a group or to develop a strategy for prevention or a response after the point of failure. Terror has no race or face, nor does it have a specific country of origin. The only way to get a handle on terror, is to understand strategies and tactics that are used by organizations, and looking for weaknesses, and ways to exploit those weaknesses. It is paramount to know how they operate, what makes them tick, what they see as an end game, are they working toward apocalypse, how are they funded and who is providing the funding. We need to know our enemy, and be skilled at using that knowledge to hit them where they are most vulnerable.
We all have tendencies to act and operate a certain way. It might be the route that we take to the grocery store, or the sequence that we follow when we get dressed. As human beings, we are creatures of habit, and this conformity to order can be beneficial to us, but it can also be detrimental. Terrorists study their targets, and they study their enemy. For a terror attack to be successful, the terrorist mind must understand the environment in which they are operating, and the standard operating procedure of the enemy. The US anti-terrorism effort has to involve the same kind of strategic evaluation when attempting to prevent terrorist attacks on US soil. Analysis of terrorist groups, their operations, and preferences, is necessary to prevent acts of violence at the hands of these groups.
What terrorist tactics and strategies can be exploited in order to enhance our national security? That would depend on what group you are looking at and their operational preferences. ISIS for example, has used free market principles to acquire materials and funding. When they originally took control of Mosul, the intent was not limited to the desire to put another notch in their belt for the caliphate. Mosul was a strategic move, that gave ISIS control of the city’s natural resources and the means by which to manufacture goods. ISIS has created terrorist’s economy, as they have used the land that they take for the caliphate, for its resources and geographical location by seizing oil, selling it to neighboring countries, stealing military equipment and either choosing to sell it, or use it for their own fighters. ISIS has even created their own currency that utilizes precious metals like gold and silver. These business savvy terrorists make it necessary for intelligence analysts to view this group and its financial dealings differently, especially when it comes to monitoring transactions while attempting to intercept those that appear shady or inconsistent with what is generally considered legitimate in its appearance. Mosul was just recently taken back from ISIS, after being in their possession for quite some time.
Behavioral profiling is an important part of understanding terrorists and their intentions. The fact that terrorist attacks usually rely on simplicity, rather than intricate plans with many moving parts, makes the tangible warning signs much more difficult to observe, left of boom. The intangible quality of one’s behavior can be the most obvious indication that is available to you right before things start to get chaotic. Someone that is walking through an airport to get on a plane with his/her family, is not going to act the same as someone that is getting ready to blow themselves up or crash a plane. Law enforcement and national security professionals entrusted with the task of keeping America safe, must also be able to observe physiological changes in individuals and integrate those observations into a broader profile analysis. These physiological signs might include, increased heart rate, diaphoresis, dilated pupils, etc. Many of these natural responses can be monitored via modern surveillance equipment that we currently have in airports and other potentially sensitive locations.
Another crucial part of any terrorist organizations’ operation, is recruiting. Recruiting is done through propaganda, and taking advantage of emotionally vulnerable individuals. Propaganda can come in the form of state run media, magazines, books, and even on Youtube. People like to win, and terror groups that tout their accomplishments, victories, and effectiveness of their jihadi message in the west, have no problems when it comes to bringing new blood into the organization. This is why we strive for tactical victories overseas, to show the world that terror can be defeated when they go toe to toe with world superpowers or western coalitions. It shoots holes in their message and shines light on their weaknesses. However, we have to keep in mind that there are limitations when it comes to tactical military victories. The optics may be good, but when you drive them out of the Middle East, and the evil invades western countries as we have seen recently in Europe and the US, the dynamic changes. Terrorists reside in every inhabitable continent and to think that we can wipe them out with bullets and bombs is blatantly naïve at best, extremely dangerous at worst. Instead we have to destroy their credibility and delegitimize their message of death and hate. Islamic terrorists draw their ideology straight from the Quranic texts, and understanding the Quran is absolutely necessary when dealing with jihadists that swear allegiance to Allah.
Islamic terrorism does not account for all terrorism in America or the world, but it does seem to be the most prominent, especially when looking at terror on a global scale. Many tactics used by the modern terrorist, have origins dating back to the founding of Islam, in the 7th century. Quranic scripture offers Muhammad as the perfect role model for men to emulate. Quran (Surah Al-Ahzab, Verse 21) states, “Indeed in the Messenger of Allah (Muhammad) you have a good example to follow for him who hopes in (the Meeting with) Allah and the Last Day and remembers Allah much.” Knowing that Muhammad was the model follower of Islam, allows you to understand the ideology that exists in this belief system, and how that ideology affects the actions and state of mind of a jihadist leading up to an attack. Jihad was a task that was given to followers by the prophet according to Quranic text. It is referenced in the Quran as, “striving in the path of God” and has been interpreted various ways, including striving for morality and armed struggle (Lewis, 2007). If we hope to prevail, in a battle with an ideology such as this, we should aim to destroy the credibility of that ideology and removing the mystique, and spectacular optics that are fed to potential recruits though propaganda. This means more winning by the US, and more dead terrorists on the other side to use as a form of counter-propaganda. Tactical victories only go so far, and they are a vehicle for taking away the glorification of the ideology, but if you hope to defeat an ideology by dropping more bombs, you are just participating in an exercise of whack-a-mole (Gorka, 2016). We are in an age of information, and ideology spreads like wildfire through the internet, and other digital outlets. 100 years ago, ISIS, Al Qaeda propaganda or the like, might have never had a global impact, due to the lack of resources to distribute the message. The information age is a double edge sword, as it can aid forces of evil, or it can give firepower to the opposition to eradicate that evil.
Many refer to Islam when they hear the word terrorism, but terrorism has no ethnic boundaries, and it does not claim any nationality. Terrorists that operate without a government sponsor, or without support from a known funded terrorist organization can kill with the same impunity, and channel the same hate, as any well-funded professional terrorist. Individuals that may commit acts of terror, in order to persuade policy makers, may not leave the same kind of paper trail, thus making it more difficult to observe activities or transactions, that might otherwise be associated with potential terrorists. Blinders cannot be worn at any time and stereotypes must be abandoned, or the probability of letting something slip by you, goes up significantly. Terrorists are classified by their experience, effectiveness, abundance or scarcity of funding and the entities that provide said funding, ideology and common cause. Race, gender, faith, and age are not relevant when one is attempting to profile, as terrorists have operatives that tend to be so diverse, that general appearance can be very deceiving when trying to identify a potential threat.
To stop a terrorist, you must be able to think like a terrorist. Knowing the rationale that accompanies decisions on target selection, and potential media exposure, makes it a little easier to predict where the next attack will happen, and where it will come from (Wright, 2011). While studying the enemy, one must remember that terrorists study law enforcement in the same fashion and that they adapt based on patterns of behavior that they observe. This is why we are told from day one to vary the sequences in how we operate, and not to fall into a cyclic routine that can be observed and capitalized upon by an observer. Terrorism exists mainly as a means by which to instill fear. This goal can be met through a ridiculously high body count, or a spectacular scene that is shown on every local and national news network for maximum psychological effect. The effects of an attack, reach every person in the country with a TV, not just those that are directly and physically affected by the attack. Mass media is played like a fiddle, at the hands of these barbarians.
Assassination is another tactic, that is used by almost every known terrorist organization. The target is usually someone that represents the establishment that the terror group is at war with, political, social, or economic figures, or a symbol of the infrastructure in which they are in conflict. Other reasons for assassinations can include intimidation, swaying public opinion, revenge, or to gain media attention. In modern times, with media being consumed by so many people, an assassination that is recorded, or on live TV, could have the maximum effect and instill fear in the masses. Look at the impact that the 8mm home movie taken by Abraham Zapruder while standing near the greasy knoll, had on the American mind, as it shows a US President having half of his head shot off while riding through Dealey Plaza. Media distribution has a huge impact on the public perception of terror.
False credentials when traveling, can be another indication of affiliation with a terrorist organization. Indicators that suggest fraudulent passports, include those that are physically altered, serial numbers that are on a watchlist, or show up as stolen, absence of additional supporting documents, significant gaps in travel history, and many others. Terrorists will always find a way, but that is why law enforcement must keep up with the latest trends in terrorist tactics as they change quite frequently, as they adapt to changes in security policy. Therefore, taking your shoes off when going through security, is ridiculous and ultimately ineffective in the grand scheme of things. We lose our rights permanently, and they just shift gears. Violating our rights to keep us safe? Some would say, that this argument doesn’t really pass the smell test.
Knowing the philosophical motivations of a terror group, is crucial when trying to anticipate their next move. Understanding details about their political leanings and world view, and whether those views are rational, or irrational in nature, is a great starting point. Is there a Bible, manifesto, or other religious or ideological doctrine that governs their actions, and sets a baseline for their moral behavior (Dyson, 2015)? It is important to keep in mind, that morality is relative, especially in religious texts, as killing someone of a certain race or religion would be the standard for morality in one case, whereas loving one’s enemies is the standard elsewhere. Ideology and word view drive the actions of terrorists, and variations of these closely held beliefs determine how they act and react to certain situations.
In conclusion, there is no cookie cutter approach to defining terror, as organizations and events must be observed objectively and handled in such a way, that the perpetrators are dealt with in an appropriate manner, and an assurance must be made that terrorists that take up arms against the US cannot use our criminal justice system against us by weighing things down with procedural pitfalls, and faux civil rights issues. As mentioned above our criminal justice system does not exist to hold trials for enemy combatants. Many people complain about our system here and the flaws that exist within the system, but the fact remains that we are still the best game in town. Local, state, and Federal law enforcement must work as one, left of boom as well as right, and there is no room for ego (Ernst, 2014). Those that enter public service should want to serve the public, and if they don’t, they are not being honest with themselves. Equal treatment under the law, without special treatment for elites or their big money donors. Most people have the view that the war on terror started on 9/11, but this conflict has existed for many years, even in this country, and 9/11 was just a significant escalation. Terrorism is a threat to our way of life, and the American dream. The fact that the very fabric of America rests in the balance here, gives our national security agencies a sense of urgency when dealing with this threat. Understanding the modus operandi of terrorists and the groups that they represent must be taken seriously, and this understanding has to include knowledge of, and respect for our constitution and the promise of liberty that America has always offered. Liberty and freedom shouldn’t be recognized as bumper sticker slogans, or words to regurgitate on the 4th of July. These hallmarks of America must continue to have meaning, those promises from our founders must not be forgotten, or go unrecognized. Awareness of the Saint Leo core value of responsible stewardship is necessary as we acknowledge the abundance of resources that God has made available to us, as we are staring evil in the face. We must effectively utilize our sense of morality when these tools are implemented, as not to affect individual rights and/or liberty, as we seek to strengthen our communities and promote safety within those communities.
Dyson, W. E. (2015). Terrorism: an investigators handbook.
Gorka, S. (2016). Defeating Jihad: the winnable war. Washington, D.C.: Regnery Publishing, a
division of Salem Media Group.
Lewis, B. (2007). The crisis of Islam holy war and unholy terror. Brisbane: Queensland Braille
Wright, L. (2011). The looming tower: Al-Qaeda and the road to 9/11. New York: Vintage
Ernst, M. (2014, March 20). How local and state cops fit into counterterrorism. Retrieved August
13, 2017, from https://www.policeone.com/police-products/police-technology/biometrics-
Jury nullification is a tool that can be utilized by a panel of jurors, to acquit a defendant that is most certainly guilty, in a case where all the evidence needed to deliver a guilty verdict is present. Some call it anarchy, others call it the purest form of justice, but it provides we the people with opportunity to look tyranny directly in the face, and overcome adversity, in a Constitutionally legal, and non-violent manner. The Federalist papers provide some insight into this little known legal maneuver, and even though the Constitution does not mention it specifically, it allows for it. It has been used throughout history for different reasons, and to different ends, but it is part of our American heritage and our constant struggle against abuse of power at the hands of government.
The US Constitution attempts to limit the power of the government through the delegation of authority to respective branches, while giving individual branches the power to override one another so that control is not centralized. It was a radical idea, that is still frowned upon even today. Some cringe with the thought that individuals would be able to carve their own path in their community, and in history. Many believe that lay people cannot be trusted with making decisions for themselves. But against all odds, the founding fathers fought for and won their independence. This led to a government, and a capitalist system that has been responsible for the highest standard of living, ever known to man. The original intention of the experiment was to avoid a dictatorship or oligarchy, by allowing representatives elected by localities to make policy collectively and giving everyone a voice through the election of individuals that are given the duty, to do the peoples’ work. It is not a perfect system, but it is the best game in town, as our founders put much thought and wisdom into our Constitutional Republican form of government. The judicial branch of the US system has been proven a powerful force in modern times, when it comes to interpreting the Constitution and the extent to which the limitations on government apply, while keeping in mind one’s individual rights and liberty. America’s legal system was founded on natural law, or God’s law, as the founding fathers believed that our rights come from our creator. Most laws however, are not concocted using a theological basis for inspiration. Sometimes there are circumstances that make literal interpretation of law unreasonable, and sometimes seemingly unfair. This can put some verdicts at the mercy of the circumstances surrounding the events in question. Then you have the potential for abuse of power that is always a distinct possibility when dealing with any government entity. George Washington once said, “government is not reason, it is not eloquence - it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master; never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action”. Jury nullification is said to be the last line of defense against the specter of judicial tyranny. Nullification makes sense, when you break it down and use a little logic. The judge cannot direct the jury to a verdict, even if the evidence to convict is overwhelming. This is the degree of autonomy that the jury has, and this independence from the powers that be is constitutionally sound, as Article III gives the court no power to coerce or force the jury to produce a verdict that is pleasing to the judge or the court. Judges already have much influence when it comes to the fate of the accused, especially when adjudicating habeas corpus actions that challenge convictions or sentences. Contemporary reviews of these actions, are evaluated by judges as they conduct judicial inquisitions, resolving disputes without utilization of a jury. The framers of the Constitution had an affinity for jury trials and the right of an individual to be provided such a trial. It would not be likely that the framers would approve of any court proceedings involving one’s rights and liberties, being decided by a lone judge, in the absence of a jury. Some make the case that a panel of jurors, with many minds functioning synergistically, are much more difficult to bribe, payoff, or blackmail, whereas a judge may be corrupted much easier and it can be done in a more expedient manner in order to serve those that pull the strings.
Jury nullification is constitutional given the fact that the powers of the judicial branch are focused and few, and the very concept of a jury trial is based on this juror independence. Article III does not give the court the power to order a guilty verdict, as this would make a jury irrelevant. The jury is to deliver a verdict independently, so even if the evidence is overwhelming and proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the defendant can walk free if the jury disagrees with the way that the law was applied in that case, on moral grounds (Lehman, 1997). In Federalist Paper No. 83, Alexander Hamilton referred to a jury trial as the, “very palladium of free government” as it acts as a tool intended to provide a check on “arbitrary methods of prosecuting pretended offenses” that act as working components of judicial despotism (Hamilton, 1788).
In order to adequately define the argument that favors the use of jury nullification in specific constitutionally relevant scenarios, one must make the case as to why the law does not exist only as a method in which to enforce universal concepts of morality for the good of society, but also as a means to impose an oligarchy’s collective world view on the masses. Those that oppose this legal concept of jury nullification, argue that it undermines the rule of law. Those that advocate for jury nullification argue that it is a last line of defense for those that are taken advantage of by an overfunded, oppressive, out of control, Federal Government that has been lawless, time and time again, with little or no consequences for the perpetrators. The level of judicial activism or legislating from the bench that has occurred in recent years, is becoming a genuine threat, as judicial rulings become an emotional response to a series of events, rather than an interpretation of constitutional law. What do we the people do, when extra-constitutional power is wielded by those that have the ability to rob us of our liberty? One usually assumes that legality is synonymous with morality. The same could be said about illegality being associated with immoral behavior. These generalizations can be misleading. Legality is relative, and law is man-made. What is legal, may be nothing more than a product of a dictator’s world view. If something is legal, it does not mean that it is a good idea, or the right thing to do. Burning an American flag is legal, but it is not generally seen as a wise or respectful move. The terms mala in se, and mala prohibita, provide relevant contrast here as some actions are universally unacceptable (murder, rape, stealing etc.). Aside from the morality standard that may be applied to some instances, there is a matter of unconstitutional laws that were enacted, using means that are at odds with our founding document. An unconstitutional law passed via the legislative process, is not valid any more than a law that is done through usurpation of power by the executive branch or other government entity that attempts to circumvent checks and balances. The supremacy clause, otherwise known as Article VI only applies to laws that are “in pursuance of”, the limitations put forth by the US Constitution, as it does not give congress the power to write legislation that goes beyond the enumerated powers that are outlined in Article I. While jury nullification is not mentioned in our Constitution, the criminal jury and its crucial role in our legal system, shows up twice in our founding document, once in the body, and again in our Bill of Rights. Article III section 2 states that “The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury”. This sixth amendment also references the jury, stating “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury”.
There are many that feel jury nullification is a form of judicial anarchy, and that it is allows for the guilty to walk free (Conrad, 2014). Let’s look at this from a different perspective, through a prosecutor’s eyes. Do prosecutors have the ability to choose whether or not to bring charges against a defendant in cases where evidence shows proof of guilt? Of course they do, as this prosecutorial discretion is a major component of our justice system. Why should a jury made up of we the people, not have this tool at their disposal? There are a handful of states that have chosen to recognize the autonomy of a jury and their power to nullify. Georgia, Maryland, Indiana, and Oregon all have acknowledged in their state constitutions, that the jury has the power, but not the right to acquit a guilty man, and also states that jurors should not be informed by the court in advance that they can do so. The key here is that a judge cannot direct a verdict even when the evidence is present. A reversible error occurs if a judge directs a guilty verdict over an objection from the defendant.
To better understand how jury nullification applies to real life cases, one must look at instances where it was used successfully. Probably the most recent high-profile case that involved utilization of jury nullification was the Bundy Ranch standoff, where Americans came to the aid of a rancher in Nevada when the Bureau of Land Management sent armed agents to Cliven Bundy’s home and killed a portion of his cattle. Even though these Americans had taken up arms against a Federal agency, and driven them from Bundy’s land, they were acquitted because the jury refused to put up with tyranny (Ritter, 2017). Looking further back, another example of jury nullification can be found during prohibition, when about 60 percent of alcohol control laws were affected by nullification (Zubair, 2013).
Bushel’s Case, (1670) 124 E.R. 1006, is a great example of a jury that stood strong to nullify in the face of adversity. The jury would not convict Penn, even when Lord Mayo threatened to starve them if they did not deliver the verdict that he ordered. Law and legality walk a very fine moral line, and as mentioned above, legal does not always equal moral, so when a people collectively decide as a jury that there is a moral argument to be made contrary to the written law, they must act as one to uphold moral order. This means staying true to the pledge to be honest, just, and consistent in their word and deed, to exude commitment and adherence to the core value of integrity.
Just like the checks and balances that are programmed into our government system here in America, jury nullification acts as an alternative check on oppression and tyranny, that can be used by the citizenry in cases of extreme government overreach, or abuse of power. James Madison wrote in Federalist Paper No. 51, “If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself “(Madison, 1788). The framers knew that government would need to be on a leash, and that if an inch was given, a mile would be taken. We have seen this creep strategy over the last 100 + years in congress, the executive branch, and the judicial branch. Legislating from the bench has become quite common and the lasting repercussions regarding the rule of law can be catastrophic. Jury trials are a major component of our Constitution, our justice system, and our overall way of life as a society. One must keep in mind that if the Constitution does not give the Federal Government the power to do something or to enforce something, then that authority is automatically delegated to the individual sovereign states. Anything over and above these limitations are unlawful and should be deemed as such. The Constitution restricts government, and does not attempt to control people or restrict their actions. The American experiment, as it was realized by our founding fathers, has changed very much and Federal agencies, and bureaucrats are not hesitant to prosecute anyone if they perceive a threat to the government’s credibility or sustainability, even in cases where Uncle Sam is in the wrong. The U.S government can sometimes appear omnipotent, in that it has influence over every aspect of our lives, from our wallets, to the education of our children, and the products that we have access to when we go the grocery store. We the people, must stay vigilant and be educated as to our God given rights protected under the U. S. Constitution, and know that there will always be nefarious forces at work, trying to deny us those rights.
Conrad, C. S. (2014). Jury nullification: the evolution of a doctrine. Washington, D.C.: Cato
Hamilton, A. (n.d.). The Federalist #83. Retrieved October 01, 2017, from
Lehman, G. D. (1997). We the jury...: the impact of jurors on our basic freedoms. Amherst, NY:
Madison, J. (n.d.). The Federalist #51. Retrieved October 01, 2017, from
Press, K. R. (2017, August 22). Jury refuses to convict in Bundy ranch standoff. Retrieved
October 01, 2017, from https://lasvegassun.com/news/2017/aug/22/jury-refuses-to-convict-
Zubair. (2013, April). Famous Jury Nullification Cases. Retrieved October 01, 2017, from
script async src="//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js">
I am disgusted with the PC culture that has taken root in this country. LGBT pride being stuffed down everyone’s throat, Black Lives Matter (BLM) setting fire to private businesses, destroying police cars, and being permitted to do so while local law enforcement is asked to stand down. Baltimore’s murder rate is through the roof right now because this PC culture has swallowed their community. Lawlessness has been given a green light, and has been embraced by establishment politicians, the so called mainstream media, and ultra-left wing hate groups like BLM that receive funding from Billionaire agitators like George Soros that are looking to destroy the American way of life.
Capitulation to immorality and barbarism, in the name of acceptance has created a major vulnerability in America. Islamic terrorism has able to take advantage of this weakness, and they are beating us over the head with it, every day. First of all, Islam is not peaceful, as Quranic scripture does not convey a message that allows for peace with non-Muslims. Open up to almost any page in this, sick, twisted, manual of hate, and you will not find a mention of peace. Compassion is only to be given to fellow Muslims, and the infidels are to convert, pay a tax (Jizya), or be killed. The Quran also has instructions for men, on how to beat their wives, and women are seen as nothing more than an object in which a man is to plant his seed for the purpose of procreation. Funny how the leftists in this country tend to come to the defense of Islam at every turn, but they ignore the real “war on women”, that is being waged by Muslims. That’s Islam and Muslims, with no need to attach the extremist or radical labels. The term radical Muslim is redundant, as Islam is inherently radical and extreme. Their willingness to commit unthinkable acts of violence, and the fact that the so called “moderate” Islamic leaders that reside in this country refuse to come out as one voice and condemn these violent acts right of boom, and in general, leads a reasonable person to believe that Muslims are working together to subvert the US Constitution, and impose Islamic law on the west, in a systematic manner. Europe and America are helping them do it as we allow political correctness to invade every aspect of our lives which in turn allows the Islamists to control aspects of our lives. Why do leftists get upset in America, when people protest Shariah law? It appears that this selective outrage, is a subtle way of showing support for the persecution of women, the murder of homosexuals, and the cold blooded killing of innocents, when they don't bow down to Islam and Islamic law. Aren't these a few of the things that leftists despise the most? The term hypocrite comes to mind.
Why are we not fighting fire with fire, and using counter-propaganda to get into the terrorists head? Why not leak a video to Al Jazeera, of US soldiers pouring blood from a freshly slaughtered pig over a mountain of .50 cal rounds? Why are we not unleashing psychological warfare on these 7th century psychopaths? From what we are told, it is because such action would go against our American values. Are we talking about the same American values that make it legal to murder infants in the womb? Or the values found in our Universities, that shut down free speech, and allow Antifa thugs to set fire to things and physically assault people that support the President? How about the values of the media, academia, Washington DC, and other leftist lead institutions that encourage transgenderism, and homosexuality by normalizing it and making it seem interesting and appealing. What about the values held by the Democrat party, that collectively booed God and the Israeli capital of Jerusalem at the DNC convention in 2012 when they added both to the DNC platform? We can’t mess with the heads of the terrorists because it goes against our values? Who are we kidding? What portion of our closely held American values, obligates us to roll over and expose our underbelly to terrorists and their violent tendencies? As an American, I am offended by anyone that suggests we should bow down to Islam to avoid ruffling any feathers. Oh, but when it comes to offending people, those of us that love freedom and liberty don’t count because we are bigots, islamophobes, xenophobes, etc. Give me a break! Funny that politicians get all self-righteous when the time comes to really go out and kick some butt, without any inhibitions in cases where it is the right thing to do. We tend to ignore the call to action, when action is needed, but when it comes to fighting for abortion, or gay rights, we are more than willing to offend anyone and everyone that may think differently. This selective outrage is inconsistent, hypocritical, and dangerous.
Political correctness is killing America and until we learn to do the right thing, without worrying about stepping on the toes of special interests and manufactured sub-groups of victims, we cannot hope to be secure in within our own borders. Sad, but true.