The Democrats have just rolled out their second whistleblower, and we still do not know the identity of the first. I have believed since the beginning of this whole circus, that there are no whistleblowers at all. Let me explain my rationale here. One of the things that made me suspicious was John Brennan’s request recently for more whistleblowers to come forward. I got the impression that the illusion of an unidentified whistleblower might spark government officials that have a beef with the President, to come forward and make accusations. The so called second whistleblower that was revealed recently seemed like an act of desperation as the Deep State continues with attempts to get someone that will agree to make their name public, to accuse the President of some form of wrongdoing. Now, with no one willing to fall on their sword for the deep State and their globalist aspirations we have two so called whistleblowers with no identity that as far as we are concerned doesn’t even exist. This is not so crazy to think, given all of the accusations that have been made over the last 3 years by Democrats, and the fact that all of them were proven false.
So, what is the motive here, and why do the Democrats and RINOs that are trying to hang Trump with this benefit from faceless whistleblowers? Answer: Whistleblowers with no identities cannot be subject to any scrutiny because you cannot haul them in front of congress, and they do not have to defend their arguments. This allows Democrats to point fingers and make accusations without having to submit the first bit of evidence. If the evidence or the testimony is elusive, then that allows congress to push never ending investigation so that they can “find” the evidence. This makes for an ongoing investigation that is seeking evidence that is not there. In the meantime, public opinion of Trump tanks because there is the impression that he has done something wrong because he is under investigation. The bottom line here is, the whole thing is one monstrosity of an illusion. This brings me back to my initial question, “Are their actually any whistleblowers?” I’m starting to think that the answer is no. Why haven’t we seen this alternate rationale in the media as to what is going on here?
So, what is the motive here, and why do the Democrats and RINOs that are trying to hang Trump with this benefit from faceless whistleblowers? Answer: Whistleblowers with no identities cannot be subject to any scrutiny because you cannot haul them in front of congress, and they do not have to defend their arguments. This allows Democrats to point fingers and make accusations without having to submit the first bit of evidence. If the evidence or the testimony is elusive, then that allows congress to push never ending investigation so that they can “find” the evidence. This makes for an ongoing investigation that is seeking evidence that is not there. In the meantime, public opinion of Trump tanks because there is the impression that he has done something wrong because he is under investigation. The bottom line here is, the whole thing is one monstrosity of an illusion. This brings me back to my initial question, “Are their actually any whistleblowers?” I’m starting to think that the answer is no. Why haven’t we seen this alternate rationale in the media as to what is going on here?