If there is anything you can be sure of, in the Obama administration, it would be the fact that he always has a scapegoat. Scandal after scandal, IRS, DOJ, NSA, Benghazi, spying on the media, the list continues to grow. How many time have we heard the so called, leader of the free world say, "I just heard about this on the news"? Which seems more than a little ironic, because in a separate statement, he states that he doesn't watch the news. The whole administration is a PR disaster. Well, that is only half right, because in order to make a PR disaster, you have to have a media that holds elected officials accountable. George W. Bush was held accountable, Barack H. Obama is not. It is the distance that the president keeps, between himself and news, that makes him untouchable, and dangerous.
You have heard the left refer to "trickle down economics", and how unfair it is to have the money trickle down from the rich to the poor. I always thought that this was a stupid argument, because it really can't work the other way around. The money or the power, comes from business owners, CEO's of corporations, etc. You have to have a person with money, sign the check to pay the working man. It is up to the working man, if he wants to someday be the one who signs the checks. Government corruption, has a similar trickle down effect. This is demonstrated , by the president in this case, being the source of the corruption, and then filling his cabinet positions with like minded individuals, or sheep that will do as they're told. Hence, the corruption is concentrated in the executive branch, and that corruption trickles down the the sheep,that do the bidding of the executive. They do this because they know what happens if you cross the boss. Going off script, has consequences. These consequences manifest themselves, in the form of forced resignation, a visit, or audit from the IRS, or worse. Obama's corruption trickles down to the lower tiers of the administration, as does the potential blame for anything that does not go as planned. But, isn't it funny, how Obama is the first one to stand up and take all the credit, on that rare occasion, when the administration gets something right. It's good to be king!
You have heard the left refer to "trickle down economics", and how unfair it is to have the money trickle down from the rich to the poor. I always thought that this was a stupid argument, because it really can't work the other way around. The money or the power, comes from business owners, CEO's of corporations, etc. You have to have a person with money, sign the check to pay the working man. It is up to the working man, if he wants to someday be the one who signs the checks. Government corruption, has a similar trickle down effect. This is demonstrated , by the president in this case, being the source of the corruption, and then filling his cabinet positions with like minded individuals, or sheep that will do as they're told. Hence, the corruption is concentrated in the executive branch, and that corruption trickles down the the sheep,that do the bidding of the executive. They do this because they know what happens if you cross the boss. Going off script, has consequences. These consequences manifest themselves, in the form of forced resignation, a visit, or audit from the IRS, or worse. Obama's corruption trickles down to the lower tiers of the administration, as does the potential blame for anything that does not go as planned. But, isn't it funny, how Obama is the first one to stand up and take all the credit, on that rare occasion, when the administration gets something right. It's good to be king!