Elizabeth Warren, has been chosen, as the next savior of the democrat party. She is being built up as the anti Obama/anti Hillary 2016 candidate. The liberal argument of the current election cycle has expired. The election strategy of todays liberal democrat, consists of a lie on top of lie, on top of a lie. This continues until the lie is so ridiculous, that even the liberal base stops believing it. The democrat establishment, or those that act according to the will of our shadow government. The powers that be, realize that incumbency is unpopular, and the status quo is no longer acceptable, so you can imagine, that anything related to President Obama or events that have taken place in the last 6 years. In response, the establishment must create a 2016 candidate that gives the democrat base, the illusion that he/she is working against Obama and the rest of the regime. Enter Elizabeth Warren. Her vote against the 1.1 Trillion dollar spending bill on Saturday, is being touted by the media as a bold move, that gives her that anti establishment spunk that voters want to see.
But as we all know, in Washington DC, smoke and mirrors rule, when it comes to pushing an agenda. Harry Reid, is in on this I'm sure, as is Nancy Pelosi. Along with any and all members of democrat leadership in both houses. But, they have to allow Warren to go rogue, in order to tout that separation from the establishment, as a major strength for a candidate in 2016. Here is the illusion, the extreme progressive ideology that Warren has always made obvious, making her the closest thing, to a third term of Barack Obama. As much of a disaster as a Hillary presidency would be, she still has a significant link to Obama, through the state department. On top of the toxic association, she is not a great speaker, and not even able to deliver a coherent response to basic questions. Not that Elizabeth Warren is any better behind a podium, but she is in much better shape, due to the lack of baggage.
The liberal media, and the democrat establishment in both houses will push Elizabeth Warren as a viable 2016 candidate, and they will give her the anti establishment label. Nothing could be further from the truth, she is the one person that can truly carry Obama's agenda through another 8 years. Obama will pretend to go to war with her, and you will see an escalation in this conflict throughout 2015, and into 2016 as a major selling point to the liberal electorate. Their 2016 candidate must appear to be working against Obama and his agenda, but, in reality, she is hand picked by the regime. Personally, I think that Clinton and Warren are both losers in a general. With the civil war going on in the democrat party, I don't think that they have a realistic candidate, that is electable. One thing is certain, the chosen one will be a ethnic minority, or a female. They cannot let go of the "racist", and the "war on women", it is all the have left, in the absence of facts, and common sense.
But as we all know, in Washington DC, smoke and mirrors rule, when it comes to pushing an agenda. Harry Reid, is in on this I'm sure, as is Nancy Pelosi. Along with any and all members of democrat leadership in both houses. But, they have to allow Warren to go rogue, in order to tout that separation from the establishment, as a major strength for a candidate in 2016. Here is the illusion, the extreme progressive ideology that Warren has always made obvious, making her the closest thing, to a third term of Barack Obama. As much of a disaster as a Hillary presidency would be, she still has a significant link to Obama, through the state department. On top of the toxic association, she is not a great speaker, and not even able to deliver a coherent response to basic questions. Not that Elizabeth Warren is any better behind a podium, but she is in much better shape, due to the lack of baggage.
The liberal media, and the democrat establishment in both houses will push Elizabeth Warren as a viable 2016 candidate, and they will give her the anti establishment label. Nothing could be further from the truth, she is the one person that can truly carry Obama's agenda through another 8 years. Obama will pretend to go to war with her, and you will see an escalation in this conflict throughout 2015, and into 2016 as a major selling point to the liberal electorate. Their 2016 candidate must appear to be working against Obama and his agenda, but, in reality, she is hand picked by the regime. Personally, I think that Clinton and Warren are both losers in a general. With the civil war going on in the democrat party, I don't think that they have a realistic candidate, that is electable. One thing is certain, the chosen one will be a ethnic minority, or a female. They cannot let go of the "racist", and the "war on women", it is all the have left, in the absence of facts, and common sense.